Back to Newsletters
B2B discovery is shifting again, and the ice is moving under every marketing team. Buyers are increasingly asking ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI-powered search tools for answers before they ever land on a vendor website. That creates a new visibility challenge for CMOs: If your brand does not show up in AI-generated answers, you may be invisible at a critical moment. The good news for the Huddle Up colony is that AEO does not require a complete reinvention of marketing. The March source material points to practical moves CMOs can make now: Assess current visibility, clarify definitions, add Q&A sections, refresh high-value pages, improve schema, modernize FAQs, strengthen SEO fundamentals, and rethink what should stay gated.
Before making changes, CMOs need to know how visible their brand already is in AI-generated answers. Free assessment tools from Webflow and HubSpot can help teams identify structural issues, crawlability gaps, and missed opportunities. These tools are not the whole strategy, but they give teams a shared starting point.
This matters because AEO is still early enough that small fixes can create meaningful gains. Webflow Chief Evangelist Guy Yalif described the current moment as one where “effort-to-reward bargains” still exist because many companies have not yet adapted their content for AI-driven discovery.
One of the simplest wins is a well-structured glossary. The source doc notes that a Huddler added a glossary explaining key industry terms and acronyms, producing roughly a 40 percent increase in traffic from LLM citations. That is a useful reminder that AI systems often need clean definitions before they can recommend or explain a category.
Glossaries work because buyers often ask “What is…” and “How does…” questions. A clear definition gives LLMs something authoritative to reference, especially in categories filled with technical language, new acronyms, or competing terminology.
The new unit of discovery is not always the keyword. Increasingly, it is the question. Buyers ask long, conversational prompts, and LLMs look for sources that answer those questions directly. Adding Q&A sections to high-value pages gives AI systems cleaner answer blocks to interpret.
During the Strategy Labs, Yalif shared that Webflow added FAQ sections and schema markup to six product pages. Within two weeks, 57 percent of Webflow’s incremental AI citations came from those six pages. That is a strong case for starting with small structural changes before launching a major content overhaul.
Improving AEO does not mean rebuilding the entire website. A faster path is to refresh the 25 to 50 pages that already drive traffic, pipeline influence, or category authority. Add current data, tighten explanations, include a concise summary, and add buyer-style questions at the bottom.
Recency matters. The March source notes Yalif’s point that LLMs pay close attention to freshness. Updating strong existing pages can be more efficient than publishing net-new content that has no authority yet.
Schema markup gives search engines and AI systems clearer information about what a page represents: Article, FAQ, product page, company profile, glossary, or another structured type. It reduces the effort required for machines to understand and reuse your content.
During the Strategy Labs, Yalif emphasized that if teams focus on only a few improvements, answering questions and implementing schema should be near the top of the list. Most LLMs can help generate schema, but a web developer should still help implement and test it before launch.
Many FAQ pages were written for old-school SEO: Short, stiff, keyword-heavy questions. LLMs respond better to natural, specific questions that sound like real buyers. Instead of “best CMO communities,” a prospect might ask, “What is the best community for a B2B CMO in Silicon Valley looking to stay up to date without wasting time?”
The more your content mirrors how buyers ask questions, the easier it is for AI systems to connect your answer to the prompt. This is not just an SEO copy tweak. It is a structure and relevance exercise.
AEO builds on SEO; it does not erase it. If a site has broken links, poor metadata, thin pages, or crawlability issues, AI systems will struggle to understand it. The basics still matter because many AI tools rely on traditional search infrastructure as part of retrieval.
CMOs should also revisit content gates. If an LLM cannot access your best educational content, it cannot cite it. Many teams are experimenting with ungating category-defining thought leadership while keeping deeper decision-stage assets gated later in the journey.
Answer Engine Optimization is the practice of making content easier for AI systems and answer engines to understand, summarize, and cite. It overlaps with SEO, but puts more emphasis on questions, structure, clarity, citations, and accessible expertise.
SEO focuses on ranking in search results. AEO focuses on being included in AI-generated answers. The two are connected because AI systems often rely on search infrastructure, but AEO requires more attention to direct answers, structured content, schema, and authority signals.
Start with the pages and topics that already matter. Run an assessment, refresh high-value pages, add a summary and Q&A section, implement schema where appropriate, and create a glossary for terms buyers and AI systems need to understand.
No. But CMOs should be intentional. Educational, category-defining, and answer-oriented content often needs to be accessible if you want AI systems to cite it. Deeper assets can still be gated when they serve a later-stage buying purpose.
AEO is still evolving, which is exactly why the early moves matter. CMOs do not need a perfect playbook before they step onto the ice. They need to make their best content clearer, fresher, more structured, and easier for both humans and AI systems to use.