Back to Newsletters
A smart 2026 marketing budget should reflect strategy, accountability, prioritization, and adaptability rather than last year’s allocations. Drawing on Andrew Cox, Lisa Cole, and Alan Gonsenhauser, this guide explains how CMOs can fund what matters, translate marketing into business value, frame AI productivity credibly, reserve room for change, and organize spend around outcomes with confidence.
’Tis the season for ugly sweaters, peppermint mochas, and the annual ritual in which marketing strategy is invited into a conference room and asked to empty its pockets.
Budget season has always been a test for CMOs. For 2026, the test looks especially festive: Fund growth, prove efficiency, make AI real, protect brand, support customer expansion, and please do all of this while “doing more with less” continues its long reign as the least useful sentence in business.
The good news? A smarter budget is not about finding magic money. It is about making sharper choices. In a CMO Huddles Studio conversation with Andrew Cox, Lisa Cole, and Alan Gonsenhauser, eight practical moves stood out for CMOs who want to plan with conviction and avoid turning next year’s budget into last year’s spreadsheet wearing a Santa hat.
The fastest way to build a mediocre budget is to begin with last year’s numbers and sprinkle a little optimism on top. That may be efficient, but so is reheating leftovers. It does not mean dinner is solved.
Andrew Cox, CMO of Forrester, offered a better starting point:
“It’s not saying the brand team gets this and the demand team gets that... It’s really looking across the organization saying: What are we being held accountable for achieving, and how do we put our money towards that?”
That is the pivot. Your budget should not merely describe departments. It should describe commitments. If the business expects marketing to influence retention, accelerate pipeline, improve win rates, or build category trust, the budget has to make those accountabilities visible.
Every CMO knows the painful truth: There are always more good ideas than available dollars. Budgeting is where “yes, and” meets “no, because.”
As Cox put it: "You’re always going to have more things you want to do than you’re able to afford... Make the decisions to put money where it matters most.”
This is where CMOs earn their strategic stripes. A little funding everywhere can feel politically kind, but it often creates a portfolio of underpowered programs. Better to fund fewer bets properly than to create a buffet of initiatives no one can taste.
Lisa Cole, CMO and AI Officer at 2X, put the matter plainly: “Your budget is your actual strategy just represented in numbers.”
Exactly. The strategy deck may have the prettier fonts, but the budget tells the truth. If international expansion is a priority, the numbers should show it. If pipeline velocity matters, enablement, lifecycle programs, and conversion work cannot be afterthoughts. If brand trust is a growth lever, it cannot live on fumes and inspirational language.
For CMOs, this is both the opportunity and the trap. The opportunity is to make strategy undeniable. The trap is pretending strategy exists where the budget says otherwise.
Brand budget conversations can get weird fast. Marketing says “trust.” Finance hears “expensive cloud.” Marketing says “awareness.” Finance hears “unattributed spend.” Nobody wins, and the meeting gets 11% colder.
Cole offers a more useful way to frame the conversation: Marketing as an ATM.
“If you do marketing well... you should be able to pull more money out of that ATM than what you put in. ATM stands for Audience, Trust and Engagement, and Monetization.”
That framing helps because it connects brand to business mechanics. Audience creates reach. Trust lowers friction. Engagement creates momentum. Monetization turns that momentum into revenue. The CMO’s job is not to apologize for brand. It is to show how brand makes demand work harder.
Quarterly pressure is real. So are board questions, pipeline gaps, and the sudden discovery that every initiative is now “strategic.” Still, a budget that only serves the next quarter can quietly mortgage the next three years.
Alan Gonsenhauser, a five-time CMO and advisor to PE-backed companies, offered this reminder: “Marketing budget needs to be aligned not only to annual priorities, but the three-year strategic plan.”
That matters because brand-building, customer experience, category creation, and market expansion are not microwave meals. They need sustained investment. A 2026 budget should fund near-term revenue and protect the longer-term work that keeps the company from buying every future opportunity at full price.
AI belongs in the 2026 budget conversation. Wild claims do not. If the plan depends on “AI will make us 20% more productive,” expect finance to ask a reasonable follow-up: Where, exactly?
Cole’s advice is refreshingly grounded: “Don’t make a 20% blanket statement. Instead, frame it in one of five ways: Budget flexibility, tech utilization, pipeline impact, scalability, and speed to market.”
That is the right level of specificity. AI might help teams launch campaigns faster, improve content reuse, reduce agency dependency, clean up segmentation, or make existing martech less ornamental. Pick the use cases. Show the operating impact. Then budget for adoption, governance, and workflow change, because software alone rarely fixes what process has already tangled.
The most suspicious budget is the one that pretends next year will behave. It will not. Markets move. Competitors wake up. Customers stall. Someone will announce an acquisition at exactly the wrong time. Such is the glamour of leadership.
Cox captured the reality: “Even six months away, we don’t know what the world’s going to look like... You need the room to experiment,” said Cox.
Some CMOs are setting aside 20% to 35% of their budgets for adaptability and innovation. The precise number will vary by company stage, category volatility, and appetite for experimentation. The principle is the same: Do not spend the whole year’s oxygen in January.
If the budget is organized only by department, the conversation can quickly become territorial. Demand wants more. Brand wants more. Customer marketing wants more. Everyone has a case, and most of them are probably right. That is the problem.
Gonsenhauser recommends shifting the center of gravity toward campaigns and outcomes: “Put 80% to 85% of your budget into revenue-generating campaigns that drive brand, demand, customer success.”
This helps CMOs move from “here is what each team costs” to “here is what the business is funding.” It also makes the sales and finance conversations cleaner, because spend is tied to growth motions rather than internal org charts.
Before you close the laptop, refill the cocoa, or pretend not to see one more budget question in Slack, ask this: Does your 2026 budget prove your strategy, or merely decorate it?
A smarter marketing budget is not a wish list. It is a set of choices with receipts. Make those choices clear enough that finance can follow them, sales can believe in them, and your team can actually execute them.
Start with the business outcomes marketing is accountable for, then build allocations around those commitments. Last year’s departmental split can be an input, but it should not be the strategy.
Connect brand to revenue mechanics: Audience quality, trust, engagement, category preference, sales efficiency, retention, and monetization. The more clearly brand improves demand and customer growth, the stronger the case.
Tie AI investment to specific operating improvements such as speed to market, better tech utilization, scalable content workflows, cleaner segmentation, or pipeline impact. Avoid broad productivity claims that cannot be traced to real work.
Some CMOs reserve 20% to 35% for adaptation, experimentation, and innovation. The right amount depends on growth stage, market volatility, and how much uncertainty the business expects to face.