Back to Blogs
Marketing and communications create more value when they operate as one growth system. Clay Helm, Julia Goebel, and Marni Puente share how shared narratives, earlier collaboration, clearer decision rights, and tighter connections to sales can turn brand credibility into greater business impact.
Customers do not organize their experience around a company's org chart. They encounter a brand through campaigns, media coverage, executive voices, employees, sales conversations, analyst reports, search results, and increasingly AI-generated answers.
When marketing and communications operate in separate lanes, the business can lose leverage across those touchpoints. Recognition earned through PR may never reach demand programs. Analyst credibility may not make it into sales conversations. Internal messaging can drift away from the market narrative. Teams may also duplicate work while telling slightly different versions of the same story.
In a CMO Huddles Studio conversation, Clay Helm of At the Helm Consulting, Julia Goebel of Alight Solutions, and Marni Puente of SAIC explored what changes when marketing and communications work as a connected system. Their experiences point toward a model built on shared business context, respect for each discipline, clear decision rights, and one recognizable brand narrative.
Helm sees an opportunity for communications teams to move closer to the commercial engine of the business. That means understanding the customer journey, pipeline priorities, sales motion, and daily business rhythm rather than operating primarily around announcements and media opportunities.
“Don't underestimate the strategic value of your communications partners on your team,” Helm said. “They aren't your competition. They're your strategic weapon.”
When communications has access to the same business context as marketing, earned credibility can work harder. A media placement, analyst mention, executive point of view, or customer story can become an input for demand generation, sales enablement, executive visibility, and customer engagement.
The connection also creates stronger accountability. Communications can understand which proof points matter to buyers and where they fit in the journey, while demand teams gain credible third-party validation they can use throughout campaigns and sales motions.
This requires both disciplines to understand how their work contributes to the larger growth system. Shared context makes it easier to recognize when a communications asset can influence demand or when a marketing initiative could benefit from communications expertise earlier in the process.
One practical opportunity is to treat earned media and analyst recognition as reusable business assets. A strong third-party mention has value beyond the initial audience that sees it.
Marketing can incorporate that credibility into paid and organic campaigns, nurture programs, sales materials, executive content, account-based programs, and other customer touchpoints. The communications team, in turn, can plan with those downstream uses in mind.
This connection is becoming more important as discovery changes. PR and earned authority can influence the information environment that search engines and large language models use to understand companies, executives, products, and categories.
The result is a broader definition of communications impact. Reach and coverage still matter, but CMOs can also ask whether credible external proof is reaching the buyers, sellers, search environments, and AI systems where it can influence decisions.
Integration works best when it preserves the expertise that marketing and communications each bring to the business.
“Each of the disciplines of marketing and communications brings different strengths,” Goebel said. “If we can remember to honor those and hold out, it will help us ensure that the work product is coming across in the voice that we hope.”
Communications brings expertise in reputation, earned credibility, executive positioning, media relationships, and narrative discipline. Marketing brings its own strengths in demand, segmentation, customer journeys, campaigns, data, and revenue activation. Combining those capabilities can create more impact than simply putting both functions under the same leader.
That distinction matters because organizational integration alone does not guarantee operational integration. Teams still need shared planning, clear roles, common priorities, and mechanisms for moving useful assets across functions.
CMOs can help by defining where each discipline leads, where collaboration is required, and how the work ultimately connects back to customers and business goals.
Goebel also emphasized the importance of meeting sales where they already work. A communications team can produce excellent coverage or compelling proof, but the business only captures its full value when sellers can find and use it.
That might mean packaging a media mention for a specific sales motion, connecting an analyst report to a priority account segment, or turning executive thought leadership into material that helps a seller advance a conversation.
This creates another feedback loop between communications, marketing, and sales. Sales can explain which proof points resonate with customers. Marketing can identify where credibility strengthens a campaign or journey. Communications can use those insights to sharpen future narratives and external programs.
Over time, the organization gets better at moving credibility from the market into the revenue motion instead of allowing valuable proof to remain isolated inside a communications report.
At SAIC, Puente sees unified marketing and communications leadership as a way to strengthen the connection between brand, culture, execution, and market impact.
“Undoubtedly it's having a consistent, unmistakable brand voice across every channel,” Puente said. “That one voice has to align through campaigns, PR, internal messaging, executive comms, but all reinforcing the same narrative.”
Consistency matters because audiences overlap. Employees are also brand ambassadors. Customers see executive communications. Prospects encounter media coverage. Analysts and journalists see marketing campaigns. AI systems encounter content from many of these sources at once.
A fragmented narrative can make the company harder to understand. A shared narrative gives each function room to adapt the message for its audience while reinforcing the same core story.
For CMOs, this makes narrative alignment an operating responsibility. Teams need enough coordination to know which messages must remain consistent, where audience-specific variation is useful, and who has decision rights when the story evolves.
Internal communications is particularly important in businesses where employees shape the customer experience. If the market hears one story while employees hear another, the brand becomes difficult to sustain.
Bringing employee communications into the broader system helps connect corporate strategy, culture, customer promises, and external positioning. It can also help employees understand how changes in the business affect customers and what role they play in delivering the brand.
That connection deserves senior leadership attention. Internal communications can help an organization move together when strategy changes, while external communications helps the market understand that change. Marketing can then translate the same narrative into customer-facing programs.
When these efforts reinforce one another, the company has a better chance of delivering the story it tells.
Timing is another recurring theme. Communications teams are often asked to promote an initiative after the strategy, campaign, or asset has already been developed. At that point, their ability to shape the narrative or identify a stronger external opportunity is limited.
Earlier involvement gives communications a chance to influence the story while decisions are still being made. It also allows teams to plan how an initiative could generate earned attention, executive visibility, customer proof, search authority, or sales value.
The same principle works in reverse. Communications should have enough visibility into marketing and revenue priorities to understand which narratives deserve sustained investment.
Earlier collaboration creates more opportunities to design work that can travel across channels instead of asking each function to retrofit finished assets for its own purposes.
AI adds urgency to this operating model because companies now need to consider how their brands are represented in generative search and AI-generated answers.
Marketing, PR, executive communications, thought leadership, analyst relations, and other forms of credible third-party content can all contribute to the information environment surrounding a brand.
That makes coordination increasingly important. A company with a clear, consistent narrative supported by credible external evidence gives both people and machines stronger signals about what the business does, where it has expertise, and why it matters.
CMOs should bring communications into conversations about AI discovery and generative engine optimization rather than treating those areas solely as extensions of SEO or content marketing. The authority communications builds can become part of the brand's discoverability.
A connected marketing and communications organization does not require every activity to be centralized. It does require teams to understand the same business priorities and recognize where their work intersects.
CMOs can assess the operating model with a few practical questions:
The goal is to create enough connection that strong work in one discipline increases the effectiveness of the others.
Customers already experience the organization as one brand. Building marketing and communications around that reality can help the company turn its story, credibility, culture, and demand programs into a more coherent growth system.
There is no single organizational structure that works for every company. Unified leadership can make alignment easier, but separate marketing and communications functions can also work effectively when they have shared priorities, strong partnership, and clear decision rights.
Earned media, analyst recognition, executive thought leadership, and other third-party proof can be incorporated into campaigns, sales enablement, account programs, nurture streams, and customer communications. This extends the value of communications beyond the initial coverage.
Early involvement allows communications leaders to help shape the narrative, identify earned opportunities, anticipate reputation considerations, and plan how an initiative can create value across media, executive, customer, and sales channels.
The content and external authority created across marketing, PR, thought leadership, and analyst relations can contribute to the information environment used by search and generative AI systems. A consistent narrative supported by credible third-party signals can strengthen how a brand is represented and discovered.
Customers and employees should encounter a recognizable brand narrative across campaigns, PR, executive communications, internal messaging, sales conversations, and other important touchpoints, even when the message is adapted for different audiences.
Listen to the full conversation about marketing and communications alignment.