Back to Blogs
Strategic inflection points rarely arrive with a clear announcement. Rita McGrath, author of Seeing Around Corners, explains how CMOs can identify weak signals earlier, distinguish leading indicators from lagging metrics, keep future growth options alive, and help their organizations act before market shifts become obvious.
By the time a market shift is obvious, much of the strategic advantage may already be gone.
That is the challenge at the heart of Rita McGrath's Seeing Around Corners: How to Spot Inflection Points in Business Before They Happen. In a CMO Huddles Expert Huddle, McGrath explored how leaders can recognize the early signals of consequential change and prepare their organizations to act before those changes become conventional wisdom.
McGrath defines a strategic inflection point as a development that creates an order-of-magnitude change in what is possible. New technology can create one. Customer expectations can create another. Changes in regulation, competitive structure, distribution, or business models can fundamentally alter the assumptions on which an existing strategy was built.
The CMO has an especially useful vantage point. Marketing sits close to customers, competitors, culture, technology, and the market narrative. The challenge is turning those observations into signals the organization can recognize and act on.
Strategic inflection points can appear sudden in hindsight. In practice, signs of change often exist long before the shift becomes undeniable.
“These things feel, when they finally burst upon you, as though they came overnight,” McGrath said. “So it's how do you pick up the weak signals that something may be happening, the leading indicators, before the inflection point is actually upon you?”
Weak signals are easy to dismiss precisely because they are weak. A few customers behave differently. An emerging competitor serves a segment the company does not consider important. A new technology performs poorly by traditional standards but improves quickly. An unfamiliar buying behavior appears at the edge of the market.
None of those developments necessarily warrants a strategic overhaul on its own. Together, they may reveal that an important assumption is starting to change.
CMOs can help by creating a disciplined way to collect and discuss these observations. Customer conversations, sales feedback, search behavior, community discussions, competitive messaging, analyst perspectives, product usage, and emerging channels can all provide clues.
The goal is to notice patterns early enough to investigate them while the organization still has choices.
McGrath offers a particularly useful test for spotting potential disruption.
“Something has the potential to be disruptive when it makes something that was once difficult, easy, and, at the same time, it makes something that was once expensive, affordable, or even free.”
That lens is especially relevant in the age of AI. Tasks that once required specialized expertise, significant time, or substantial budgets can suddenly become accessible to far more people. The strategic question goes beyond whether a new tool makes an existing process more efficient. Leaders also need to consider what becomes possible when a former constraint disappears.
CMOs can apply this test to their own markets. What customer problem is becoming dramatically easier to solve? Which expensive capability is becoming broadly accessible? What friction has historically protected an incumbent business model? What happens if that friction disappears?
Those questions can reveal threats, but they can also expose opportunities. A capability becoming cheaper may unlock a new segment, service model, distribution strategy, or customer experience.
Revenue, pipeline, market share, and customer acquisition cost are critical measures, but they primarily tell leaders about outcomes produced by decisions and conditions that already occurred.
During periods of change, relying too heavily on those measures can create a dangerous delay. The business may continue to hit familiar targets while the assumptions supporting future performance are weakening.
Leading indicators provide another perspective. These might include shifts in customer behavior, changing product usage, emerging competitors, new search patterns, movement between channels, or customer enthusiasm for a new experience.
McGrath offered a simple example of thinking differently about measurement: “Before customers will use our stuff, they have to love our stuff. So I want to measure customer love.”
For CMOs, the practical lesson is to complement business outcomes with measures that reveal whether the conditions for future growth are strengthening or deteriorating.
A useful executive dashboard should help answer two questions: How is the business performing today, and what are we learning about where performance could come from tomorrow?
Recognizing change is only part of the problem. Organizations also need enough clarity about what they are trying to preserve or build as the environment shifts.
McGrath describes several ways companies can establish a strategic center. An organization may orient around its mission, its distinctive technologies and capabilities, a particular customer or problem, an ecosystem or region, or the removal of an important source of friction.
The distinction matters because companies facing disruption can easily define themselves too narrowly around today's products.
McGrath contrasts Kodak and Fujifilm as an example of capability-based thinking. Both had deep expertise associated with photographic film, but Fujifilm was more successful in identifying underlying capabilities that could be applied beyond the declining film market.
For CMOs, strategic centering helps clarify which parts of the brand and business should remain stable while products, channels, technologies, and market conditions evolve. It gives the organization a foundation for telling a coherent story about change.
A changing strategy often exposes limitations in organizational design.
Traditional functional structures were built for efficiency and scale. They can become slower when important customer outcomes require coordination across many departments.
McGrath points toward smaller, cross-functional teams aligned around a shared mission as one way organizations can respond. In her discussion, she cited Fidelity as an example. By moving work into small cross-functional teams operating in two-week cycles, the organization reduced the time required to introduce a website feature by 75%.
For CMOs, the implication reaches beyond marketing organization design. Customer journeys frequently cross marketing, sales, product, service, technology, and operations. If every change requires a chain of handoffs between functional silos, the company may struggle to respond at the speed of the market.
Clear strategic intent combined with teams empowered to act can shorten that distance.
Short-term pressure creates another challenge. When leaders need to improve immediate financial performance, future-oriented investments are often the easiest to cut because their returns are less certain.
McGrath describes a portfolio that includes the core business, new platforms for growth, and options that could become important in the future.
The core produces today's results. New platforms can become tomorrow's growth engines. Options create relatively small opportunities to learn about futures that are still uncertain.
When organizations repeatedly cut platforms and options to protect the core, they can consume what McGrath describes as their “seed corn.” Current performance may improve while the portfolio of future opportunities quietly disappears.
This is particularly relevant for CMOs because experimentation, emerging channels, customer research, brand building, new segments, and new technologies can all face pressure when near-term ROI becomes the dominant decision criterion.
“You can't shrink your way to greatness,” McGrath said. “That's not going to happen. So a strategy, when it's done right, is pulling you into the future.”
The CMO's job is to make the connection between those future-facing investments and the company's growth strategy understandable enough that leadership can make deliberate tradeoffs.
AI provides a current example of a potential inflection point, but McGrath cautions against beginning with the technology itself.
A more useful starting point is the desired future state. What should the customer experience look like two or three years from now? How should employees work? Which forms of friction should disappear? What should the company be able to do dramatically better?
From there, leaders can work backward to determine where AI may help create that outcome.
This approach also reduces the temptation to treat every new capability as a strategy. Technology can enable a strategic choice, but the organization still needs a view of the customer, the outcome, and the advantage it is trying to create.
For CMOs, that means AI planning should remain connected to customer value and business strategy. The strongest opportunities may emerge from rethinking what becomes possible rather than automating every existing marketing process.
Marketing has an unusual role during strategic inflection points because it helps interpret the outside world for the organization while also explaining the organization's strategy to that world.
That gives CMOs an opportunity to become active participants in sensing and communicating change.
A practical inflection-point review could ask:
These questions will not predict the future with certainty. They can make an organization more attentive to change and more prepared to act when evidence begins to accumulate.
Seeing around corners is ultimately about creating strategic options before circumstances remove them. CMOs who systematically bring customer signals, market shifts, emerging technologies, and changing narratives into executive decision-making can help their organizations recognize what is coming while there is still time to shape the response.
Rita McGrath describes a strategic inflection point as a development that creates an order-of-magnitude change in what is possible for a business. Technology, customer behavior, regulation, competition, and business-model changes can all create inflection points.
CMOs can look across customer conversations, sales feedback, search behavior, product usage, competitors, emerging channels, analyst perspectives, and other market signals for patterns that suggest important assumptions are beginning to change.
Lagging indicators such as revenue and pipeline measure outcomes that have already occurred. Leading indicators can provide earlier evidence of changing customer behavior, demand, adoption, or market conditions that may influence future performance.
Start with the desired business or customer outcome and work backward. McGrath recommends thinking about what good should look like several years from now, then determining how technologies such as AI can help create that future state.
Maintain visibility into the company's portfolio of core investments, emerging growth platforms, and future options. CMOs can help leadership understand which experiments and capabilities are creating information or opportunities that may be important to future growth.
Listen to the full conversation about seeing around corners.